Legal Opinion
United States of America, and v. Cheryl Marie Gigley, and Cross-Appellee. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Cheryl Marie Gigley, And
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2000No. 99-3025, 99-3062, 99-3048, 99-3049PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
These matters are before the court to correct an error in the issuance of the panel’s opinions on March 24, 2000. Through clerical error, a dissent prepared by Judge Robert H. Henry was not attached to the disposition of appeal numbers 99-3049 and 99-3062. Consequently, we recall the mandates in appeal numbers 99-3025, 99-3048, 99-3049 and 99-3062, issued on April 17, 2000 and vacate the court’s original judgments in these appeals. The court’s opinion in 99-3049 and 99-3062, with the dissent included, is attached to this order and is reissued today. Also, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Charles Michael KissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Juan PardoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Willie Green, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Munguia-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.