Reed & Noyce, Inc v. Municipal Contractors, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtC. L. Horn, J.
This is an appeal as of right by defendant Fisher Contracting Company of a judgment, after a bench trial, finding it liable to plaintiff in the amount of $26,765.24 plus costs. At trial, defendant Municipal Contractors, Inc. was in default. The trial court required plaintiff to choose to proceed either against defendant Fisher or defendant Municipal Contractors, Inc. Plaintiff elected to proceed against Fisher, and plaintiff’s action against Municipal was dismissed. If the judgment against defendant Fisher is reversed, plaintiff appeals the directed verdict granted to defendant Clinton County…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Warren Tool Co. v. StephensonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Denny v. GaravagliaMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Darling v. BuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Berger v. MeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Tri-City Motors & Sports, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- First Public Corp. v. ParfetMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- In RE v. Pangori & Sons, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.