Legal Opinion
Save Valley, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 17, 2002No. Cause IP 99-0058-C-B/GPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Save the Valley, Inc. (“Save the Valley”), Thomas Breitweiser and L. Jae Breitweiser, sue the United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. (“the EPA”) under the Clean Water Act (“the Act”), originally known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 86 Stat. 816, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and the Federal Mandamus Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a), Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and a writ of mandamus. Plaintiffs contend that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Breitweiser v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Prairie Rivers Network v. Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2018