Legal Opinion

Neely v. Merchants Trust Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 16, 1941No. 4584Published

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

An issue is raised herein as to whether or not certain stenographer’s fees should be *199taxed as costs in favor of the successful defendants.

A decree was signed by me on January 20, 1939, and entered in the civil docket on January 23, 1939, dismissing the bill of complaint with costs running to the defendants. 26 F.Supp. 130. Thereafter, an appeal was taken to the Circuit Court of Appeals resulting in an affirmance on June 29, 1940. 3 Cir., 113 F.2d 953. Plaintiff then sought a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court, which was denied on November 18, 1940…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re CalefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1931
  2. Neely v. Merchants Trust Co. of Red Bank, NJCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Neely v. Merchants Trust Co. of Red BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
  4. Neely v. Merchants Trust Co. of Red BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API