Pilcher v. Lotzgesell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Still, J., entered March 9, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action for the partition of real and personal property and for an accounting, after a trial on the merits before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The briefs in this case are exceedingly large and the record voluminous, but a perusal of the case convinces us that the material facts are few and simple. The complaint discloses that Gertrude Eliza and George Henry Lotzgesell were husband and wife, their heirs being the plaintiffs and defendants in this action, together with one son, John Lotzgesell, a bachelor, since deceased. The mother died March 6, 1889, having executed a will making the husband her sole heir, none of the children being mentioned in the will. The will was what is termed a nonintervention will, providing that the husband…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barnes v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Spaulding v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Denny v. HoldenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farrell v. MentzerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Lotzgesell v. CydellWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Arnold v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Frederick v. MichaelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Nichols v. CapenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.