Legal Opinion
Alston v. Bendheim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 23, 2009No. 08 Civ. 1517PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Drs. Bendheim, Bernstein, Koenigsmann, and Wright and Physician Assistant Rodas (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved under Rule 12(b) 6, F.R. Civ. P. to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiff, pro se, Ronald Alston (“Alston” or the “Plaintiff’) alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed.
I. PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Alston was incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility at the time of filing his complaint on February 14, 2008. See Am. Cmpl. At p. 2. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Randle v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- WESLEYAN METHODIST CHURCH v. Village of CanisteoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Barnes v. UzuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Briglin v. DinelloDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Carpenter v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.