Legal Opinion

People v. Ruckdeschel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant’s contention that the record contains no evidence, dehors the confession of defendant, of the commission of the crime of robbery, first degree. The corroboration required by CPL 60.50 must be such independent evidence as will establish the corpus delicti, i.e., the body of the crime of robbery, first degree, without any reliance upon the confession itself; and such evidence, independent of the confession, must establish each and every element of the crime, and then the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. UlisanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AlvarezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
  2. People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. FulmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. People ex rel. Ruckdeschel v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. PlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API