Legal Opinion
Laquila Construction, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 23, 1999No. 98 Civ. 5920(HB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BAER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Laquila Construction, Inc. and Pinnacle Concrete Corp. (“Laquila”), a joint venture, commenced this suit on August 19, 1998 seeking a declaration of coverage under an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois (“Travelers”). Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendant now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Laquila had a contract with HRH Construction Corporation (“HRH”) to provide concrete for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marianna Distasio v. Perkin Elmer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Podell v. Citicorp Diners Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Eljer Manufacturing, Incorporated v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Intervening-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Swire Pacific Holdings Inc. v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Yale University v. Cigna InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- RK Mechanical, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.