Legal Opinion

Moody v. Irwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1914No. 22,570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom Jasper Circuit Court; William Darroch, Special Judge. Action by Granville Moody and another against Schuyler C. Irwin and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This action was commenced to review a judgment of the circuit court of Jasper County, establishing a stone road improvement under the provisions of §§7694-7710 Burns 1908, Acts 1905 p. 521, Acts 1907 p. 561. Appellees demurred to the amended complaint for want of sufficient facts, and the demurrer was sustained. Exception was taken, and appellants declined to plead further. Judgment was rendered against appellants for costs. Prom this judgment this appeal is prosecuted, and error is assigned in sustaining the demurrer to the amended complaint.

The appellees have filed their written motion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stockton v. YeomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Klebar v. Town of CorydonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McCurdy v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Ex parte KileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Stockton v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talge Mahogany Co. v. Astoria Mahogany Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Gerke v. Citizens State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API