Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Dean

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Tuscola. (Wixson, J.) Attachment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in head-note 1.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This suit was commenced by writ of attachment in the circuit court for the county of Tuscola. No personal service of the writ was made upon the defendant, and the plaintiff proceeded to judgment before the defendant learned that suit had been instituted.

Judgment was rendered March 16, 1885. May 5, 1885, the defendant entered a special motion to set aside said judgment and quash the writ for alleged defects in the affidavit for the writ, and filed an affidavit in support of the motion, setting forth that at the date of the issuing of the writ the plaintiff and himself were both residents of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haywood v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Nicolls v. LawrenceMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rieger v. HarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Caille Bros. v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Clabaugh v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lyon v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ferry v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API