Legal Opinion

Vey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1997No. 1777 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Charles Vey (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a decision by a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) granting the modification petition filed by Coco Brothers, Inc. (Employer). The issue before the Court is whether the WCJ erred in applying the net method, rather than the gross method, to determine Employer’s subrogation rights and liabilities with respect to a third-party settlement.1

*15On December 24, 1985, Claimant suffered a compensable work-related injury when the scaffold on which he was working…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Emanuel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kochie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (F.D.I.B.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API