Legal Opinion
Waterbury v. Quebedeaux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 5, 1986No. 86-4PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LABORDE, Judge.
This is a suit for wrongful conversion. Plaintiff, Robert L. Waterbury, appeals the trial court’s determination that the sale of Mr. Waterbury’s car by defendant, L.J. Quebedeaux, was proper pursuant to LSA-R.S. 32:521. The trial court denied plaintiffs damage demand for the seizure and sale of the car along with plaintiffs demand for embarrassment and inconvenience damages. The trial court also denied the reconventional demand asserted by L.J. Quebedeaux for wrecker and storage fees. Both plaintiff and defendant appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 1, 1980, plaintiff, while…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglas v. HaroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Abadie v. MoralesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. SpalittaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. SpalittaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Jackson v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fike v. FikeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Waterbury v. QuebedeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987