Hall v. Dusenbury
New York Surrogate's Court
Petition by Hall & Blandy, attorneys and counsellors at law, to compel the administrator of decedent’s estate to pay to them two judgments for costs, recovered in favor of petitioners’ clients, against respondent in his official capacity. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
William W. Dusenbury, as administrator of this estate, has appeared in response to a citation directing him to show cause why he should not pay to the petitioners, attorneys at law, two several judgments for costs recovered against him as such administrator, and in favor of petitioners’ clients, Charles Dusenbury and Benjamin H. Dusenbury.
It appears that the actions, in which such judgments were obtained, were brought by the administrator to recover certain moneys claimed to belong to this decedent’s estate, and to be in the hands of the defendants. The petitioners allege that,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNulty v. . HurdNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Stilwell v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Hurlburt v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Davidson v. . AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bulkley v. StaatsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.