Davidson v. . Alfaro
New York Court of Appeals
These were cross-appeals from a judgment of General Term, affirming a judgment of Special Term. (Reported below, 16 Hun, 393.) This action was an equitable one to compel the set-off of a judgment obtained in favor of the defendants against the plaintiffs, against" a claim in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants.
Read the full summary
These were cross-appeals from a judgment of General Term, affirming a judgment of Special Term. (Reported below, 16 Hun, 393.) This action was an equitable one to compel the set-off of a judgment obtained in favor of the defendants against the plaintiffs, against" a claim in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants. The trial court found, substantially, the following facts: On or about the 20th day of November, 1872, the plaintiffs commenced an action in this court against the defendant, Alfaro, to recover the sum of $550-$T°¡r, with interest from November 11, 1872, being the amount of…
1Per curiam
opinion for affirmance as to defendants' appeal, and for dismissal of plaintiffs' appeal.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Littlefield v. . Albany County BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Kinney v. TaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Rando v. National Park BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hopper v. ErslerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.