Nargiz v. Henlopen Developers
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Vice Chancellor.
This appeal is from a decision of the Superior Court which construed the application of the federal Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., to a contract for the sale of a high-rise condominium unit as authorized by the provisions of the Delaware Unit Property Act, 25 Del.C. § 2201 et seq. Plaintiff below appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment and from the granting of the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
There is no dispute as to the material facts. On June 28, 1972 appellant entered into a written contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leslie W. McCown v. James W. Heidler, Leslie W. McCown v. Joseph C. Caldwell, Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Hoffman v. Charnita, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Melhorn v. Amrep CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Adema v. Great Northern Development Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- Zachery v. Treasure Lake of Georgia, Inc.(GA.)District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
3Cited by13 opinions
- Winter v. Hollingsworth Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Dorchester Development, Inc. v. BurkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Appalachian, Inc. v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Schatz v. Jockey Club Phase III, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
- Beauford v. HelmsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.