Legal Opinion

Nargiz v. Henlopen Developers

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 29, 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

This appeal is from a decision of the Superior Court which construed the application of the federal Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., to a contract for the sale of a high-rise condominium unit as authorized by the provisions of the Delaware Unit Property Act, 25 Del.C. § 2201 et seq. Plaintiff below appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment and from the granting of the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

There is no dispute as to the material facts. On June 28, 1972 appellant entered into a written contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leslie W. McCown v. James W. Heidler, Leslie W. McCown v. Joseph C. Caldwell, Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Hoffman v. Charnita, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Melhorn v. Amrep CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Adema v. Great Northern Development Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
  5. Zachery v. Treasure Lake of Georgia, Inc.(GA.)District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winter v. Hollingsworth Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Dorchester Development, Inc. v. BurkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Appalachian, Inc. v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Schatz v. Jockey Club Phase III, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
  5. Beauford v. HelmsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API