Legal Opinion

Drake v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1992No. 12 M.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, 40 P.S. § 1009.101 et seq. Although the statute was repealed on October 1, 1984, by its successor, the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, Act of February 12,1984, P.L. 26, No. 11, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701 et seq., the terms of the No-Fault Act still control the obligations of insurers of victims of serious accidents which occurred while the act was in effect and who still suffer from injuries received in those accidents. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. FertigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Company v. Lisa Ann ObusekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Gallagher v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. American Motorists Insurance v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Jackson v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Com. v. Cirillo, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API