Legal Opinion

Hobart Estate Co. v. Waters

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1934No. Docket No. Sac. 4802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District. Upon a full consideration of the cause, we are satisfied that the opinion of Mr. Justice Plummer properly disposes of the issues, and we hereby adopt it as the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:

“In this proceeding the petitioners seek a writ of mandate from this court directing the respondent to accept the sum of $229.83 in full payment of taxes levied and assessed against property belonging to said petitioners situate in the county of Calaveras, and upon the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pullman Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lake Tahoe Ry. & Transp. Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. San Diego & Arizona Railway Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Independent Energy Producers Ass'n v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Hobart Estate Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API