Legal Opinion

City of Nome v. Alaska Steamship Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 8, 1971No. A-97-69 CivPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PLUMMER, Chief Judge.

This action involves damage to a diesel engine which allegedly occurred while the engine was in the defendant’s possession in transit from Illinois to the City of Nome. The defendant, Alaska Steamship Company, received the engine at its dock in Seattle from Northern Pacific Railroad. There is a material issue of fact as to whether a bill of lading was issued at that time and, if so, whether it was issued to the primary rail carrier or the switching line. There is also a dispute as to whether the bill of lading, if issued, was issued before or after the ship sailed.

T…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. The Port of Tacoma, a Municipal Corporation v. S.S. Duval, Formerly S.S. Mount Rainier, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Pacific S. S. Co. v. CacketteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Hartness v. Iberia & V. R. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1924
  5. Aspen Pictures, Inc. v. Oceanic Steamship Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Commerce & Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Insurance Company of North America v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Pan American Mail Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  4. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc. v. Ken Penn Amusement, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Federal Insurance v. Transconex, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API