Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Francesconi v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1961No. Nos. 23299, 23300PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This appeal reached the writer by way of reassignment.

Section 107.170 of the statutes requires the contractor for state public works to furnish a bond conditioned upon payment for all materials and labor used thereon. Section 522.300 authorizes a person furnishing such labor or materials to sue on that bond in the name of the state. It was under these provisions that the State of Missouri became a nominal party participant in this case. The purpose of the bond requirement is to provide persons furnishing labor and material the bond security in lieu of mechanics’ liens…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yeats v. BallentineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Camdenton Consolidated School District No. 6 Ex Rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Oliver L. Taetz, Inc. v. GroffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Davis, Fed. Agent v. Standard RiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Moore v. Board of Regents for the Normal School in Distinct Number TwoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crystal Tire Co. v. Home Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Boyd v. MargolinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Wallace v. BoundsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Bodde v. BurnhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Maurer v. WernerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API