Legal Opinion

ADKINS v. 3M COMPANY

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided September 30, 2021No. 7:20-cv-00012Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS Case No. 3:19md2885 EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Judge M. Casey Rodgers Brandon Adkins, 7:20cv012 Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (“JMOL”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) on all of Plaintiff Brandon Adkins’ claims on statute of limitations grounds. Additionally, Defendants argue that the evidence is insufficient for a reasonable jury to find for Adkins on his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hibbard v. Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca & O'HernWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Colonial Imports, Inc. v. Carlton Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API