Tubbs v. Green
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:
The court is called upon to determine the enforceability of certain restrictive covenants contained in a deed to real estate.
Complainants, Mr. and Mrs. Tubbs and Mr. and Mrs. Monsell (hereafter referred to as “complainants” unless further identification is necessary) as the owners of resi*153dences in a development known as Wilmington Manor, seek an injunction against the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Green, to prevent them from erecting a store, allegedly in violation of certain restrictive covenants, on certain lots owned by the Greens in the same development.
The problem…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
- Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
- Frink v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crowley v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Welshire, Inc. v. HarbisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Hollingsworth v. SzczesiakCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
- New Castle County v. Pike Creek Recreational Services, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Tubbs v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.