Legal Opinion

Yap v. Slater

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided February 9, 2001No. Civ. 99-458 ACKPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KAY, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are fully set forth in the Court’s Order filed October 5, 2000, granting Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The following summarizes only those facts necessary for an understanding of the disposition of the issues in this motion.

Denis C.F. Yap (“Plaintiff’) worked as an air traffic controller (“ATC”) for the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) from June 1973 to February 19, 1999. Plaintiff was forced to retire when he reached the age of 56 pursuant to the mandatory…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ahuvia v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  2. Malloy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API