Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mink v. Keim

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1943Published

1DissentDesmond, J.

The question tendered to us on this appeal is essentially one of Supreme Court practice, since at bottom it involves the efficacy of attempts made by plaintiffs to escape the effect of an outstanding Supreme Court order of consolidation.

The four plaintiffs above named brought, in 1939, three separate personal injury actions (Marion Mink and Herman Mink, her husband, suing together) against the owners and drivers of two automobiles which had been in collision and in one of which automobiles three of the plaintiffs here (Marion Mink, Helen Lefkowitz and Abraham Altschuler) had been passengers.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. . ScovillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Honsinger v. . Union Carriage Gear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Kriser v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Sweeting v. Staten Island & Midland Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Blake v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API