Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1936No. Civ. 1745Published

1Dissent

I dissent.

While I believe that the able and logical opinion written by Mr. Presiding Justice Barnard and concurred in by Mr. Justice Jennings correctly states the law applicable to the facts of the instant case as that law was announced a number of years ago and as I still believe it should exist, I cannot agree with my associates that the opinion is in accord with the present conception of the law of negligence, contributory negligence and the doctrine of the last clear chance as applied by the courts in the more recent cases. I agree with my associates that our prior decision (138 Cal.App.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API