Legal Opinion

Patton v. Baltimore & Ohio R.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 1951No. Civ. A. 8634PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNS, District Judge.

Four slag cars, which were owned by defendant (“B & O”) and which were being .unloaded by third-party defendant (“Duquesne”), while parked on a ’downgrade, began to roll downhill and crashed into other cars at 'the foot of the slope. John Patton, who was working at the bottom of that hill, was killed instantly. Alleging negligence and violation of the federal Safety Appliance Act 45 U.S.C.A. § 1ff., Patton’s widow filed the complaint’at bar under the Pennsylvania death and survival statutes. 12 P.S. § 1601 et seq., 20 P.S. §§ 320.603, 320.613. Defendant removed the’ cáse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railroad v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Stegner v. FentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Baccile v. Halcyon Lines (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  5. Long v. Union R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patton v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (Duquesne Slag Products Co., Third Party Defendant) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Patton v. Baltimore & OR Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. McKee v. Jamestown Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API