Legal Opinion
Therrien v. Hamilton
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 24, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-30175MAPPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
(Docket No. 17)
PONSOR, District Judge.
On March 6, 1995 Magistrate Judge Kenneth P. Neiman recommended that the Motion to Remand be denied. No objection having been filed to this Report and Recommendation, it is hereby adopted and the motion is DENIED.
It is So Ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Arthur J. Therrien has moved to remand this action to the Massachusetts Superior Court of Hampden County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Plaintiff is a police officer in the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alshrafi v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Pacheco v. St. Luke's Emergency Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Kingsley v. LaniaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- STEFANIK v. City of HolyokeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.