Anandarajah v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Julian Rajanayagan Anandarajah (“An-andarajah”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or “Board”) decision denying his fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition for review.
I
Anandarajah, a citizen of Sri Lanka and an ethnic Tamil, petitioned for review of the Board’s order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision to deny his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). He alleged a fear of persecution, claiming that the Sri Lankan…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Tengiz Sevoian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Jian Lian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Efrain Modesto Calle-Vujiles v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.