Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip Crockett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 26, 1996No. 94-3217PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Phillip Crockett disputes the quantity of cocaine for which he was held responsible by the district court when it determined his sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Crockett pleaded guilty to conspiring with Kenneth Gullo, David New and others over a period from May 1991 through January 1992. Crockett was the supplier of drugs to Gullo, New and the others, who traveled from Springfield to Chicago to purchase drugs from him and then returned to Springfield to resell the cocaine.
Crockett argues on appeal that the evidence upon which the sentencing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bienvenido DuarteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gene E. BelerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Ortiz, JoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Dale McCourtney Hodge, A/K/A Dedan Kimathi Wilson, A/K/A Keith JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Vincent Adams, Robert D. Petty, Jr., Tracy T. Fitzgerald, Charmin Banks and Gregory HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Roger D. ZehmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.