In re Roberts

Respondent was admitted to practice in 1971 by the Appellate Division, *1025Second Department. He has maintained law offices in Montgomery and Hamilton Counties.

In February 1996, this Court suspended respondent pending his full compliance with a subpoena duces tecum obtained by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards (224 AD2d 801). In December 1997, because of respondent’s willful violations of the suspension order and the attendant circumstances, this Court found respondent in contempt of court and fined him $1,500 (245 AD2d 951).

Petitioner now moves for a default judgment on a…