Simpson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for sale of marihuana. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, punishment was assessed by the court at five years,
ihe sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
The record reflects that undercover agents of the Department of Public Safety purchased three hundred pounds of marihuana from appellant on March 5, 1971, in an orchard near McAllen.
At the outset, appellant contends the court erred in allowing the State during direct examination of its witness Imbert, a narcotics agent, to divulge the existence of a telephone…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brazzell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Salas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Whatley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Armitage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Riojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Harrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.