Whatley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a conviction for fondling. Punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty-five years.
At the outset, appellant contends that the court failed to properly examine the competency of three minor children who testified adversely to appellant.
Appellant complains that the court failed to conduct an examination into the competency of prosecutrix, aged eleven, and two other children, aged nine and eleven, in accordance with Article 38.06, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. The pertinent portion of Article 38.06, V.A.C.C.R., provides:
“All persons are competent to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Brazzell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Witt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Blassingame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Harrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Guia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.