Legal Opinion

Oral Roberts University v. Automatic Switch Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1970No. Civ. No. 69-C 296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The Court has under consideration the Defendant’s Special Appearance and Motion to Quash and Plea to Jurisdiction.

Plaintiff alleges that a valve manufactured and sold by Defendant malfunctioned in one of Plaintiff’s buildings in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in which it had been installed, causing extensive damage to the building and contents and requiring the expenditure of money for labor and other expense as a necessary result of said damage. Plaintiff’s action is based on breach of express and implied warranties of fitness with reference to the valve.

By the pleading…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marathon Battery Company v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Speed Fastners, Inc. v. NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Fayette v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
  4. Singer v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  5. Newman v. Charles S. Nathan, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Public Service Co. v. Black & Veatch, Consulting EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API