Legal Opinion

Pate v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is a suit to recover attorney, fees in certain delinquent drainage tax suits. The defendant is the county collector of Pemiscot county, and holds the,fees sought to be recovered under an agreement pending the outcome of this litigation. The case was tried under an'agreed statement of facts'and in addition the testimony of defendant. The agreed statement of facts is as follows:

“Now at this time it ’is admitted that the plaintiff Sharon J. Pate, is the duly appointed, qualified and acting attorney for drainage districts Nos. 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and118, of Pemiscot County, Missouri, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Livesay v. DearmondOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kerens v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Ranney v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. In Matter of GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API