Legal Opinion

People v. Feinstein

New York District Court

Decided September 13, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Donovan, J.

The defendant is charged with a violation of the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Hempstead. When the case was called for trial defendant moved to dismiss the information for insufficiency.

The defendant’s property is located in a business district. The material portion of the ordinance reads as follows:

" ARTICLE 7
" Business Districts
“ Sec. X-1.0. In a Business District the following regulations shall apply:
" A building may be erected, altered or used, and a lot or premises may be used for any of the following purposes and for no other: * * *
" X-1.10. Carpenter, Hand Cabinet-Making…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People v. KucNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. MacMillan v. McCaffreyNew York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. JarmainCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
  2. People v. MackeyNew York District Court · 1969
  3. People v. BohoyNew York Court of Special Session · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API