Muraoka v. American Osteopathic Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Defendants, the American Osteopathic Association (“AOA”) and the National Os*617teopathic Foundation (“NOF”), seek sanctions, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11, for failure of plaintiff Charlene Muraoka’s attorneys Abraham Brustein and Jeffrey M. Marks of Dozoryst, Brustein, Neuman & Marks to conduct a “reasonable inquiry,” prior to filing this case, into the facts and law underlying Muraoka’s complaint. For the reasons discussed below, we grant the motion of AOA and NOF for sanctions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 11.
Factual Background
Plaintiff Muraoka filed the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Elizabeth Thornton v. Robert WahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chisholm v. Foothill Capital Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996