Legal Opinion
Hootstein v. Amherst-Pelham Reg'l Sch. Comm.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 11, 2019No. Civil Action No. 17-30146-MGMPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARK G. MASTROIANNI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*99Plaintiff Michael Hootstein is a custodial grandparent of a student at Amherst Regional High School ("ARHS") and of a young child who will attend Amherst schools. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and brought claims against Defendant Amherst-Pelham Regional School Committee ("Defendant") related to lead-contaminated water at Defendant's schools, including ARHS. The complaint alleges two causes of action: first, a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that Defendant's response to lead-contaminated drinking water violated Plaintiff's, his grandson's, and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- ALATORRE v. HOLCOMBDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023
- Abernathy v. Spectrum Health Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Ablordeppey v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- Damon T. Gee v. Trent Allen, Charlie Fox, W. Callahan, Jeremy Alberson, Andy Bagienski, Christina Wright, Marie Loyd, A. Wilson, V. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2026
- EDWARDS v. CARTER JR.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.