Legal Opinion

Marbourg v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1879PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. At the November Term, 1878, of the district court, C. H. & L. J. McCormick, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment for $231.80 and costs, against defendant Marbourg, who brings the case to this court. The facts, pleadings and proceedings are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

C. H. & L. J. McCormick commenced an action against W. W. Marbourg and James H. Lea, late partners as Marbourg & Lea, alleging that on April 14, 1874, the plaintiffs made, constituted and appointed said Marbourg and Lea their agents to sell and dispose of for cash, or notes payable to the order of the said plaintiffs, upon only good and responsible parties, McCormick reapers and mowers, on commission, as per written contract therefor, a copy of which was *40attached to and made a part of the pleading; that “ between the 14th day of April and…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. Parker v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. McKneely v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. Dalton v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API