Legal Opinion

Kinnear & Gager Manufacturing Co. v. Miner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 7, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

General Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Trial, by jury at the April Term, 1915, Windham County, Butler, J., presiding. Verdict directed for the plaintiff, and judgment thereon. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

The plaintiff is a foreign corporation, and has not complied with P. S. 774 prescribing certain conditions precedent to such a foreign corporation’s right to do business in this State. It entered into a contract with the defendant engaging to furnish certain materials for the latter’s new building at Brattleboro. It carried out this undertaking, making delivery of the materials to the defendant in Ohio. The latter accepted the goods and made use of them as contemplated by the contract. The plaintiff brought this suit for the price of the goods and the validity of the contract was established.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. General Oil Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Redd Distributing Co. v. BrucknerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Palm Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. BjornstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  5. Vilter Manufacturing Co. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API