International Bank v. Securities Corp. of District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a general order denying a motion to vacate a judgment of condemnation in a garnishment proceeding.
It is sought to invoke a question of jurisdiction on the statement of the trial justice in a memorandum opinion that he thought section 2 of Law Rule 55 of the Supreme Court of the District to be controlling in this ease. It is insisted that a motion of this sort is not controlled by rule 55, and that therefore the order was without the jurisdiction of the court. The order is a general one, and can be sustained if there was any jurisdiction in the court to make such an order.…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Price v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Smith v. United States ex rel. GorloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Ray v. BruceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.