Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Keller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1944No. 2634PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sued the defendant for $174.59, the alleged damage to his car which was run into from the rear by a car driven by the defendant on Barrow Street in the City of Houma about half past six o'clock on January 2, 1944. The defendant filed a reconventional demand against the plaintiff for $159.59, the alleged damage to his car caused by the collision. The case is here on an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount claimed by him in his suit. While the reconventional demand is not mentioned in the judgment, it was impliedly rejected.

There is not a great…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. KnightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Finance Security Co. v. ThurmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Boudreaux v. IseringhausenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Silverstein v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Caruthers v. HollowayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Branstetter v. GerdemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. McNulty v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Peranio v. Superior Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. McNeely v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Dunaway v. CadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API