Legal Opinion
Nussbaum v. Weeks
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1989No. E004893PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
Action for nondisclosure in the purchase of an 80-acre parcel of real property. The seller sued, alleging that the buyer, the general manager of a water district, had a fiduciary duty to disclose his intention to cause a change in water policy affecting the subject real property. The jury found in favor of the seller and the general manager appeals.
Historical Background
The Coachella Valley Water District (District) provides Colorado River water to the Coachella Valley through the Coachella Canal. The District maintains a water distribution system which provides…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Karoutas v. HomeFed BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Headlands Reserve, LLC v. Center for Natural Lands ManagementDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- GCN Products, Inc. v. O'YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.