Legal Opinion

Farrier v. Leicht

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 28, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00588Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MARY J. FARRIER, Case No. 1:19-cv-588 Plaintiff, Black, J. Litkovitz, M.J. Vs. GEORGE LEICHT, et al., ORDER AND REPORT AND Defendants. RECOMMENDATION Proceeding pro se, plaintiff brings this action against defendants George Leicht, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio (“Bankruptcy Court’), Judge Beth J. Buchanan, and Ditech Financial, LLC (“Ditech”) in relation to actions taken during her bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio. (Doc. 1).…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API