Legal Opinion

State v. Buchmann

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1986No. C1-85-981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Bradley Buchmann was found guilty of two counts of second degree assault under Minn.Stat. § 609.222 (1984). On appeal, Buchmann argues that a new trial should have been granted or the case should have been dismissed because: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions; (2) there was juror misconduct; (3) the prosecution failed to comply with the discovery rules; (4) the prosecution improperly impeached a witness; and (5) there was newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

FACTS

On the evening of Friday, March 23, 1984, several young people from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. United States v. Jerome Burton Schroeder, United States of America v. Anthony August Mosser, United States of America v. Warren James AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Crisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API