Legal Opinion
Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Fibercon Industries, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 7, 1986No. Nos. BD-487, BD-488 and BG-310PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOANOS, Judge.
The appeals and cross-appeals in BD-487 and BD-488 involve a number of issues including whether the deputy commissioner erred in finding claimant permanently and totally disabled; finding that Fiber Form/FIGA must pay for treatment of claimant’s hypertensive disease; finding a causal relationship between the hypertensive disease and the first accident; directing Fibercon/Traveler’s to pay compensation for half the PTD at a rate of $56/week and to pay for half of claimant’s psychiatric care. Case BG-310 involves a subsequent order involving reimbursement between carriers, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flagship National Bank of Broward County v. HinkleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Rowe & Mitchell v. RodgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Bell Rentals and Sales v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cruise Quality Painting v. PaigeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- City of Melbourne v. HaddockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Sun Lakes Realty & Construction Co. v. TaylorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- GNB, Inc. v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990