Legal Opinion

Bynum v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 25, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2016-1904Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CEMONE ANTENETTE BYNUM Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1904 (EGS) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cemone Antenette Bynum (“Ms. Bynum”), an African- American woman and employee of the District of Columbia’s Department of Behavioral Health (“DBH”), brings this lawsuit against the District of Columbia (the “District”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., alleging the following…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API