Legal Opinion

Lamoria v. Health Care & Retirement Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1999No. Docket 199795PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court convened this special panel under MCR 7.215(H)(3) to resolve the conflict between the prior vacated opinion in this case, Lamoria v Health Care & Retirement Corp, 230 Mich App 801; 584 NW2d 589 (1998), and Rymar v Michigan Bell Telephone Co, 190 Mich App 504; 476 NW2d 451 (1991), regarding the “reasonable time to heal” doctrine under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (HCRA), MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq.

The original Lamoria panel, in compliance with MCR 7.215(H)(1), followed this Court’s holding in Rymar that an employee who on the date of his discharge is unable to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rymar v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Lamoria v. Health Care & Retirement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Figgins v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Michigan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  2. Hawkins v. Genesys Health SystemsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. United States Ex Rel. Diop v. Wayne County Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Kerns v. Dura Mechanical Components, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re Complaint of Michigan Cable Telecommunications Ass'n Against Ameritech MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API