Matter of Weinstein v. Board of Regents
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order of Appellate Division reversed and determination of the Board of Regents of the State of New York confirmed. The determination is supported by substantial evidence and the Appellate Division has no power under section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act to review such a determination “ on the facts ”. (Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N. Y. 65.) (See 293 N. Y. 589.)
Concur: Ch. J., LoughbaN, Lewis, CoNWay, moNd and JJ. Taking no part: Rippey, J.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Miller v. KlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Tompkins v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Graffenburg Dairy, Inc. v. Du MondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Matter of Shell Creek Sailing Club, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of the Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Zimmerman v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Zeidler v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.