Romani v. Cramer, Inc.

ORDER

PONSOR, District Judge.

Upon de novo review, this Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted, and the Motion for Summary Judgment is ALLOWED. The Connecticut statute of repose applies; no adequate evidence supports plaintiffs contention that it has not been violated. So ordered.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(Docket No. ST)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

7. INTRODUCTION

This action concerns product liability, breach of warranty, negligence and strict liability claims asserted by William J. Romani (“Plaintiff’) against Cramer, Inc.…