Legal Opinion

Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 13, 1955No. Civ. No. 4282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

This is an action for recovery on a certain boiler and machinery insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant. It is claimed by the plaintiff that within the terms of the policy accidental damage occurred to a pipe in a Dowtherm Boiler, which forced a shutdown of the boiler and resulted in the partial interruption of plaintiff’s business. A substantial loss under the policy is claimed.

The particular question now before the Court arises on plaintiff’s motion for the production, inspection and copying of a certain report prepared by Mr. C. R. McGraw…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  4. Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Walsh v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carpenter-Trant Drilling Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1959
  2. Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API