Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
This is an action for recovery on a certain boiler and machinery insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant. It is claimed by the plaintiff that within the terms of the policy accidental damage occurred to a pipe in a Dowtherm Boiler, which forced a shutdown of the boiler and resulted in the partial interruption of plaintiff’s business. A substantial loss under the policy is claimed.
The particular question now before the Court arises on plaintiff’s motion for the production, inspection and copying of a certain report prepared by Mr. C. R. McGraw…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. IoziaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Walsh v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carpenter-Trant Drilling Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1959
- Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1955