Legal Opinion

Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 28, 1955No. Civ. 4282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover, under a boiler and machinery insurance' policy issued to it by the defendant company, for loss resulting from a “leak”, “rupture”, or “explosion” of a pipe in a Dowtherm boiler.

How, among these possibilities, the occurrence which caused plaintiff’s loss can be legally characterized, will determine whether the plaintiff should recover its full claim, one-half of it, or nothing at all. Each side, as it were, walks a tightrope between these possibilities, since plaintiff contends that the occurrence was sufficiently violent to constitute a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Empire Coal Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Bower v. ætna Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1944
  5. L. L. Olds Seed Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API