Julius Hyman & Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks to recover, under a boiler and machinery insurance' policy issued to it by the defendant company, for loss resulting from a “leak”, “rupture”, or “explosion” of a pipe in a Dowtherm boiler.
How, among these possibilities, the occurrence which caused plaintiff’s loss can be legally characterized, will determine whether the plaintiff should recover its full claim, one-half of it, or nothing at all. Each side, as it were, walks a tightrope between these possibilities, since plaintiff contends that the occurrence was sufficiently violent to constitute a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Atlas Assur. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Empire Coal Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Bower v. ætna Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1944
- L. L. Olds Seed Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997